Netlify vs Vercel vs Remoud: Best Frontend Hosting

A few years ago, placing static HTML online was tedious. Then came the "Jamstack" revolution led by Netlify and Vercel. Now, as fullstack development returns to traditional server containers, where do you host your apps?

1. Vercel

Vercel created Next.js, and unsurprisingly, their platform is highly optimized for it. If you have a Next.js frontend with serverless API routes, Vercel gives you instant edge network integration.

Pros: Next.js perfection, fast global edge network.

Cons: Aggressive pricing for bandwidth limits and server execution limits on non-enterprise tiers.

2. Netlify

Netlify paved the way for modern continuous deployment. They excel at serving pure static sites with heavily optimized build caching, forms integration, and identity tools.

Pros: Very generous free tier for static bandwidth; great plugin ecosystem.

Cons: Dealing with backend logic via serverless functions can become complicated compared to long-running server code.

3. Remoud

Remoud bridges the gap. Instead of restricting you to serverless functions, Remoud provisions full containers. This means that an Express.js server, a Python API, or a fullstack Docker container can live comfortably beside a React frontend.

Pros: Straightforward pricing, Docker support, real terminal access.

Cons: Not entirely suited if you require heavy global edge rendering directly out of the box (requires configuring a CDN like Cloudflare in front of it).

Conclusion

If you're building purely next-gen serverless on Next.js, use Vercel. For static docs, use Netlify. If you just want your code to run on a reliable server without vendor lock-in, use Remoud.